WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥� The Supreme Court is allowing to remain in place, but has agreed to hear arguments in the case in early November.
The justices said Friday they will decide whether the federal government has the right to sue over the law. Answering that question will help determine whether the law should be blocked while legal challenges continue. The court is moving at an unusually fast pace that suggests it plans to make a decision quickly. Arguments are set for Nov. 1.
The court鈥檚 leaves in place for the time 小蓝视频 a law that clinics say has led to an 80% reduction in abortions in the nation鈥檚 second-largest state.
The justices said in their order that they were deferring action on a request from the Justice Department to put the law on hold. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that she would have blocked the law now.
鈥淭he promise of future adjudication offers cold comfort, however, for Texas women seeking abortion care, who are entitled to relief now,鈥� Sotomayor wrote.
Amy Hagstrom Miller, the chief executive of Whole Woman鈥檚 Health, said Friday's order means patients will continue to be denied care at the four Whole Woman's Health clinics in Texas, on top of the hundreds who already have been turned away.
鈥淭he legal鈥痩imbo is鈥痚xcruciating鈥痜or both patients and鈥痮ur鈥痗linic staff," Miller said in a statement.
The law has been in effect since September, aside from a district court-ordered pause that lasted just 48 hours, and bans abortions once cardiac activity is detected, usually around six weeks and before some women know they are pregnant.
That's well before the Supreme Court's major abortion decisions allow states to prohibit abortion, .
But the Texas law was written to evade early federal court review by putting enforcement of it into the hands of private citizens, rather than state officials.
The focus of the high court arguments will not be on the abortion ban, but whether the Justice Department can sue and obtain a court order that effectively prevents the law from 小蓝视频 enforced, the Supreme Court said in its brief order.
If the law stays in effect, 鈥渘o decision of this Court is safe. States need not comply with, or even challenge, precedents with which they disagree. They may simply outlaw the exercise of whatever rights they disfavor,鈥� the Biden administration wrote in a brief filed earlier in the day.
Other state-enforced bans on abortion before the point at which a fetus can survive outside the womb, around 24 weeks, have been blocked by courts because they conflict with Supreme Court precedents.
鈥淭exas should not obtain a different result simply by pairing its unconstitutional law with an unprecedented enforcement scheme designed to evade the traditional mechanisms for judicial review," the administration wrote.
A day earlier, the , saying the federal government lacked the authority to file its lawsuit challenging the Texas ban.
The Justice Department filed suit over the law after the Supreme Court rejected an earlier effort by abortion providers to put the measure on hold temporarily.
In early October, U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman ruled for the administration, putting the law on hold and allowing abortions to resume.
Two days later, a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals put the law back into effect.
The court already is hearing arguments on Dec. 1 in in which that state is calling for the court to overrule the Roe and Casey decisions.
Mark Sherman, The Associated Press
