LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) 鈥� Supporters of a proposal to ask voters to scale back Arkansas鈥� abortion ban sued the state on Tuesday for to get the measure on the November ballot.
Arkansans for Limited Government, the group supporting the proposed constitutional amendment, asked the state Supreme Court to reverse the state鈥檚 decision. The group asked the court to order Secretary of State John Thurston's office to begin counting the signatures submitted on the petitions, which would have been enough had they been certified.
The secretary of state鈥檚 office said on July 10 that the group didn鈥檛 submit required statements related to the paid signature gatherers it used. The group has said the documentation it submitted 鈥� which included a list of the gatherers 鈥� did meet the legal requirements.
鈥淭he secretary鈥檚 unlawful rejection of petitioners鈥� submission prevents the people of Arkansas from exercising their right to adopt, or reject, the amendment,鈥� the group's lawsuit said. 鈥淭his court should correct the secretary鈥檚 error and reaffirm Arkansas鈥檚 motto, Regnat Populus, The People Rule.鈥�
Thurston's office said it was reviewing the lawsuit and did not have an immediate comment.
The proposed amendment would prohibit laws banning in the first 20 weeks of gestation, and allow later abortions in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman鈥檚 health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth.
The group submitted more than 101,000 signatures on the state鈥檚 July 5 deadline. They needed at least 90,704 signatures from registered voters and a minimum number from 50 counties.
Election officials cited a 2013 Arkansas law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for signature-gathering were explained to them.
State records show the group did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of its paid canvassers and a statement saying that the petition rules had been explained to them, and that its July 5 submission additionally included affidavits from each paid signature-gatherer acknowledging that the initiative group had provided them with all the rules and regulations required by the law.
The state has asserted that this documentation didn鈥檛 comply because it wasn鈥檛 signed by the sponsor of the initiative, and because all of these documents were not included along with the signed petitions.
Despite these disputes, the initiative group says Arkansas law requires they be given an opportunity to provide any necessary paperwork so that state can begin counting the signatures.
The U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 with a ruling that created a national push to have voters decide the matter Arkansas now bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless it鈥檚 necessary to protect the mother鈥檚 life in a medical emergency.
Lawmakers in the Republican-controlled legislature approved the current law. Giving voters a chance to weigh in on a constitutional amendment would test support for abortion rights in the state, where top elected officials regularly promote their opposition to abortion.
Litigating this effort to reinstate the petitions could be difficult. Conservatives hold a majority of seats on the seven-member Arkansas Supreme Court.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion-rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned 20 weeks into pregnancy, earlier than other states where abortion remains legal.
Andrew Demillo, The Associated Press
