In the world of agriculture we are into the time of year where issues tend to cool, and farmers have a moment to exhale and relax just a little bit.
Harvest is complete, and in the case of 2011 it was a long fall season with generally good weather conditions which allowed farmers to put the crop in the bin without a lot of adversity. The result for most was an average crop, or better, put in the bin in good condition, in a year when grain and oilseed prices are as good across the board as they have ever been.
The mood regarding the 2011 crop has to be generally good.
With the current crop harvested, it is still too early for most farmers to begin more than rudimentary planning for 2012, so that is not yet on the issue agenda.
In Saskatchewan there is an election which might attract some farmer attention, but agriculture is not exactly high on the issue agenda.
That is the case for a couple of reasons.
On the one hand many of the key issues in terms of farmers relate to safety nets, and for the most part participation in the programs with the federal government are longer terms deals that neither front-running party, the Saskatchewan Party, or New Democrats are about to opt out of.
And then there is the simple truth of money. In Saskatchewan health care, education, and debt payment takes up the largest portion of the province's spending pie. With all other expenditures, highways, social services, agriculture and other departments divvying up what are the crumbs of expenditures, there is simply little expectation of significant changes in agriculture spending.
So while the vote Nov. 7 in Saskatchewan is important, it is not a big event in terms of key issues.
Which puts most farmers back on the Canadian Wheat Board.
There is a lot of effort 小蓝视频 put into rallying support for a last ditch effort to make the federal government pay attention in terms of maintaining the single desk selling agency for Western Canadian wheat, durum and export barley.
It is interesting an organization such as the Yorkton Chamber of Commerce is hosting a debate on the issue, even as the Saskatchewan Chamber has come out in favour of change.
That a local Chamber is wading into the fray by providing a public forum for both sides is interesting, although it might be too late to have an effect since the Conservatives look completely entrenched in its view and in its course of action.
It is too bad the debates had not been held earlier, and that there was some feeling the federal government might listen to the groundswell.
While Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz have deaf ears on the issue, the way of democracy is to raise a voice and hope the powers in Ottawa finally realize it is voters talking.
