Toronto 鈥� After months of broadly hinting Saskatchewan would be getting into nuclear power production, as well as a reference in the recent speech from the Throne, Premier Scott Moe has taken the first concrete action in that direction. Indeed, his statements in the press conference suggest Saskatchewan could go whole hog into nuclear power for electrical power generation in the coming years, possibly replacing both coal and natural gas further down the road.
While in Toronto on Dec. 1, Moe signed a memorandum of understanding with Ontario and New Brunswick with regards to the development of small modular reactors, (SMRs).
Moe, Ontario Premier Doug Ford and New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs released the following joint statement:
鈥淥ntario, Saskatchewan and New Brunswick agreed today to work together to explore new, cutting-edge technology in nuclear power generation to provide carbon-free, affordable, reliable, and safe energy, while helping us unlock economic potential across Canada, including rural and remote regions.
鈥淲e have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), committing to collaborate on the development and deployment of innovative, versatile and scalable nuclear reactors, known as small modular reactors (SMRs), right here in Canada.
鈥淪MRs could generate clean and low-cost energy for both on-grid and off-grid communities, connect more remote and rural areas of our province, and benefit energy-intensive industries, including the mining and manufacturing sectors. It could also drive economic growth and export opportunities as these technologies are further adopted across the country and around the world.
鈥淥ur governments support a collaborative approach to reducing emissions and growing the economy in a way that meets the specific needs and economic priorities of each province. We look forward to continuing to work together on innovative energy solutions and creating the best business environment to attract jobs and growth in regions right across the country.鈥�
During the press conference, Moe noted that Saskatchewan is committed to reduce emissions in the electricity sector by 40 per cent below our 2005 levels by 2030.
Leading off the press conference he said, 鈥淲e believe we can do this without unnecessary taxes that burden families, businesses. Taxes that really do little in reducing emissions directly. Saskatchewan鈥檚 plan of Prairie Resilience achieves our emissions reduction through targeted investments in innovative technology in our Canadian industries, without impacting our jobs, or impacting the Saskatchewan economy.鈥�
鈥淏ecause our responsibility to address climate change also comes with a responsibility to protect our economies, keeping jobs in our province and keeping our sustainable industries competitive. Today we are joining as premiers and provinces to look at the coming decade and beyond, to advance the development of zero emission small modular nuclear reactor technology. Implementing small modular reactors will provide meaningful action in reducing our carbon emissions in electricity production while providing affordable, baseload power to our communities and industries.鈥�
Estevan and Coronach have been under considerable angst over the future of coal-fired power near those communities, and Moe suggested that places that already have power generation transmission infrastructure might be potential sites for SMRs. He said, 鈥淚n addition to providing reliable, sustainable and affordable baseload power supply, this technology has the potential of creating high quality jobs and local economic development opportunities in communities where existing transmission infrastructure already exists, or, further, in rural and remote communities that currently rely on higher emissions power production.鈥�
Saskatchewan, in particular, has been under pressure to reduce its reliance on coal-fired power generation as the federal government has pushed to phase out coal-fired power nationwide by 2030 in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Ontario has already phased it out under its previous Liberal government, and Alberta was put on that path by its previous NDP government. New Brunswick and Nova Scotia still rely on coal for some of their power production.
Use of nuclear power would eliminate carbon dioxide emissions versus either coal- or natural-gas fired power generation which it replaces.
Moe鈥檚 statement hinted that Saskatchewan could go heavily into nuclear power. He noted that Saskatchewan could reduce its power generation greenhouse gas emissions by adding through carbon capture and storage to its coal-fired generators, 鈥渙r replacing those generators with combined cycle natural gas generation.鈥�
Moe said, 鈥淏y incorporating small modular reactor technology, in place of natural gas, or in place of coal generation with carbon capture and storage, that 40 per cent reduction target that I mentioned would actually move to 70 per cent emissions reductions by 2030, 80 per cent by 2040, and a complete 100 per cent elimination of Saskatchewan鈥檚 electrical generation emissions by 2050. This is positive for Saskatchewan, this is positive, for Canada, and it鈥檚 taking real action in addressing global climate change.鈥�
One option to reduce carbon dioxide emissions has been 鈥渃lean coal.鈥� While Saskatchewan was the first jurisdiction in Canada to implement a commercial-scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) system on a coal-fired generating unit, Boundary Dam Unit 3, the concept has not caught on elsewhere. Even within Saskatchewan, SaskPower has also chosen not to implement CCS on Boundary Dam Units 4 and 5. An equivalency agreement with the federal government reached in 2019 allowed the life of those units to be extended a few more years, otherwise federal regulations would have required them to shut down by the end of 2019.
A study put out in late 2018 by the Regina-based, SaskPower-affiliated International CCS Knowledge Centre indicated a second generation of CCS could be implemented at Shand Power Station. The report鈥檚 summary indicated that, compared to Boundary Dam Unit 3, 鈥渁 CCS system at Shand could see capture capital cost reductions of 67 per cent per tonne of carbon dioxide captured as well as 92 per cent in potential savings to power plant integration capital cost.鈥�
The Saskatchewan government has not made any decisions on whether to implement CCS on its remaining coal fleet of Boundary Dam Unit 6, Poplar River Power Station and Shand Power Station. Beyond the aforementioned hints, at this point, there has not been any definitive indication from the provincial government where potential small modular reactors would be placed, should they be built.
While Saskatchewan has long been a world-leading producer of uranium, it has never developed a nuclear reactor beyond a tiny research reactor at the University of Saskatchewan which, after several decades, was recently decommissioned. The idea of nuclear power in Saskatchewan has be brought forward several times in the late 20th century, but nothing ever came of it. If this MOU does turn into actual power production, it will be this province鈥檚 first foray into the generation of nuclear power.
If these three provinces do go forward with new nuclear power, they, and in turn, Canada, will be bucking a trend of major western economies moving away from nuclear power even as developing nations move towards it. Japan shut down most of its nuclear power facilities after the Fukushima disaster, with the island nation turning to other energy sources like liquified natural gas as a result. The same event prompted Germany to also move away from nuclear power. The United States has two unites under construction in Georgia.
The World Nuclear Association website world-nuclear.org stated, 鈥淭oday there are about 450 nuclear power reactors operating in 30 countries plus Taiwan, with a combined capacity of about 400 GWe (gigawatts). In 2018 these provided 2563 TWh (terawatt-hours), over 10 per cent of the world's electricity.
鈥淎bout 50 power reactors are currently 小蓝视频 constructed in 15 countries, notably China, India, Russia and the United Arab Emirates.鈥�
听
