MONTREAL 鈥� A group of French-language university leaders in Quebec is coming to the defence of English schools who say a planned tuition hike for out-of-province students could devastate their finances.
"Any measure that would put the very existence of a university at risk, or weaken it to the point of impairing it, must be excluded from the discussion," the heads of Universit茅 de Montr茅al, Universit茅 Laval, Universit茅 de Sherbrooke, Polytechnique Montr茅al and HEC Montr茅al wrote in an open letter published in La Presse Wednesday.
Tuition for new students from other provinces and territories would increase from about $9,000 to around $17,000 starting next fall under the Quebec government plan announced earlier this month. That would be among the highest undergraduate tuitions for domestic students in the country, raising fears that the measure would gut attendance at the province's three English universities, McGill, Concordia and Bishop's, which welcome more non-Quebec students than French universities.聽
Provincial government officials say the tuition hike would help correct an imbalance between the French and English university networks, and end subsidies for Canadians who come to Quebec for university and leave when they complete their studies. The province would also charge universities $20,000 for every international student they admit and reinvest those sums in French-language institutions.
The government also hopes to halt what it claims is a decline of the French language in Quebec. "It's nothing against anglophones, it's for the survival of the French language that we must stop this trend and then reverse it," Premier Fran莽ois Legault said last week. "When I look at the number of English-speaking students in Quebec, well, it threatens the survival of French."
The five university leaders, however, rejected that argument and other characterizations of non-Quebec students by proponents of the tuition increase.聽
Students from outside Quebec have been portrayed as "threats to the prosperity of the French language, freeloaders and cash cows," they wrote. "They should rather be seen as players who, like Quebec students, contribute to the excellence, quality, diversity and relevance of our institutions."
The letter followed a Monday letter in support of the increase from the heads of the 10 schools that compose the Universit茅 du Qu茅bec network. That letter evoked a "chronic underfunding of our francophone universities" and a need to increase access to higher education for French speakers.
The academics who penned Wednesday's letter said they understand the desire to better balance resources between schools, but underlined that the tuition increase would amount to a redistribution of funds, rather than a new investment in local universities.
"The real issues 鈥� the place our universities, both French and English, should occupy in Quebec's development and its positioning in the great concert of nations, and the resources we want to devote to this grand project 鈥� remain unresolved," the university leaders concluded.
Several student unions, including groups representing students at French-language universities, have also opposed the tuition increase.
"As of right now, we don't think this policy will reach its goal of protecting the French language, and we're angered that (...) Canadian students are the victims of it," Alecsandre Sauv茅-Lacoursi猫re, secretary-general of the F茅d茅ration des associations 茅tudiantes du campus de l鈥橴niversit茅 de Montr茅al, said in a recent interview.
Catherine Bibeau-Lorrain, president of the Quebec Student Union 鈥� a network of 11 student associations across the province 鈥� said the organization opposes all tuition increases. But Bibeau-Lorrain took particular issue with what she said is a lack of clarity in the latest plan.聽
"For us, this announcement was a bit of a muddle, a bit of an improvisation," she said in an interview. Both Sauv茅-Lacoursi猫re and Bibeau-Lorrain said student groups plan to campaign against the tuition hike.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 25, 2023.
Thomas MacDonald, The Canadian Press
