COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) 鈥� Backers of a in Ohio vowed swift legal action Friday, after the state ballot board approved language describing their proposal for voters that they decried as inaccurate, devious and manipulative.
Over the objections of Citizens Not Politicians' lawyer, the Republican-controlled panel approved language that will describe the proposed 15-member citizen redistricting panel as 鈥渘ot elected by or subject to removal by the voters of the state.鈥�
It describes the amendment鈥檚 restrictions on lobbyists and politicians influencing the map-drawing process as limits on citizens鈥� rights to free expression. And, in a particularly noteworthy change added at the last minute, it describes the amendment, which is specifically intended to prevent partisan gerrymandering, as specifically requiring it.
鈥淚 just keep thinking about that book 鈥�1984,鈥� " said Catherine Turcer, Common Cause Ohio executive director and a member of the large bipartisan coalition supporting Issue 1, referring to the famous novel by George Orwell. 鈥淵ou know, 鈥榃ar is peace, freedom is slavery.鈥� The way that the ballot language plays around with the word 鈥榞errymandering鈥� to make it mean exactly what it doesn't is both jaw-dropping and it makes you question the integrity of elected officials."
GOP state Sen. Theresa Gavarone, who proposed the 鈥済errymandering鈥� phrasing, said drawing lines to affect outcomes based on voters鈥� party affiliations meets the dictionary definition.
Ohio League of Women Voters executive director Jen Miller, speaking for the ballot campaign, said a legal challenge will be filed next week in the Ohio Supreme Court.
鈥淲e'll make the point that this is just another example of why we need to get politicians out of the redistricting process,鈥� she told reporters after the vote. 鈥淭hey continue to violate the law over and over and over again. They insult voters, and they do everything they can to keep themselves and their cronies in power.鈥�
The ballot language describes Issue 1 as repealing 鈥渃onstitutional protections against gerrymandering approved by nearly three-quarters of Ohio electors鈥� in 2015 and 2018. While that is technically the case, it is that very system that produced of legislative and congressional maps that courts declared unconstitutionally gerrymandered in Republicans鈥� favor.
Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose, who chairs the ballot board, said he and his staff worked painstakingly to assure the ballot language they presented accurately describes the voluminous proposal Citizens Not Politicians submitted, which was more than 7,000 words long. He defended his 900-word summary as far more thorough than that submitted by the redistricting campaign, which included just five bullet points.
鈥淭he way that you end up on the current commission is pretty straightforward,鈥� LaRose said. 鈥�(The proposed process) is a bit of a Rube Goldberg device that involves a lot of twists and turns." He said it is a complex process that wasn't adequately explained.
McTigue said voters who want to will have the opportunity to read the proposed amendment in full, either in newspapers where it is required to be published or on the wall at their polling place.
He said LaRose's lengthy summary was designed to discourage support for Issue 1. He said the committee's language closely followed the redistricting amendments of 2015 and 2018, which the ballot board approved without issue.
鈥淚 would describe the language as a farce of Shakespearean proportions,鈥� he said.
Later in the meeting, LaRose grilled McTigue about how many times the Citizens Not Politicians campaign's petition language had to be submitted before it was approved 鈥� a separate process controlled by fellow Republican Dave Yost, the state attorney general. McTigue, a Democrat, said three, what Yost described as 鈥渃ritical errors or omissions鈥� and a third time to .
LaRose seemed to imply that the committee's history there suggested maybe its wording submissions aren't always so perfect. 鈥淭hou doth protesteth too much, methinks,鈥� he quipped.
The proposed amendment, advanced by , calls for replacing the current redistricting commission 鈥� made up of four lawmakers, the governor, the auditor and the secretary of state 鈥� with a 15-person citizen-led commission of Republicans, Democrats and independents. Members would be selected by retired judges.
As a member of the existing commission, Republican Gov. Mike DeWine expressed concerns about the system. However, he has and vowed to pursue an alternative come January if it is approved by voters.
Defenders of Ohio's existing redistricting commission system point to the panel's on a set of Ohio House and Ohio Senate maps good through 2030. However, Democrats agreed to that deal 鈥� and 鈥� with the knowledge the 2024 issue was coming.
Julie Carr Smyth, The Associated Press
