New Zealand had never launched a dispute under a free trade agreement until two weeks ago, on May 12, when it accusing our government of breaking its promises on dairy imports.
This was also the first dispute launched under the TPP since its signing in 2016. But as the export of dairy products is particularly important for New Zealand’s economy, their concern is understandable.
Canada has been heavily criticized for its protectionist supply management system. Earlier this year, under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade (CUSMA, also known as USMCA). This was also the first dispute under this new version of the North American agreement.
Repeated disputes and trade issues due to supply management undermine our trade relations.
Besides penalizing our trading partners, supply management is also counterproductive for our own economy. In fact, supply management is one of the most iconic failings of Canadian protectionism. Markets have long been distorted by import quotas, tariffs, and production controls on dairy products, eggs, and poultry.
Tariffs have historically been as high , which directly impacts consumers, penalizing them through inflated prices in a manipulated and overregulated market. The effect is intensified with generalized inflation now surging.
According to the (OECD), prohibiting any serious competition whatsoever with producers outside the country costs Canadians an average of $2.6 billion a year. A 2016 Montreal Economic Institute study found that this system increases the average annual grocery bill by $300 to $444.
In today’s dollars, this amounts to between about $349 and $517. Unsurprisingly, low-income families feel this the most. The same 2016 study found that supply management pushed up to 190,000 Canadians into poverty.
We also need to consider the constraints that the system places on the Canadian agriculture sector. Despite opportunities, Canada’s supply-managed farms simply do not have the ability to increase production. The , purchased at high prices to meet domestic demand, do not allow producers to adjust supply to global demand increases or decreases.
On the one hand, the OECD has predicted that global demand for dairy products , faster than for most other agricultural products. Conversely, dairy quotas have led to t – at one point, five million litres a week in Ontario alone during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Canadian policy-makers might want to consider that their New Zealand counterparts could actually know what they’re talking about. Since abandoning its own supply management regime years ago, the country’s industry has become . Over the past three decades, its annual dairy exports have grown from just over NZ$2 billion to almost $20 billion. In fact, it now , a statistic which should inspire Canadian leaders.
The same can be said for Australia, which . This deregulation resulted in lower prices for consumers – milk prices dropped 12 cents a litre in the first six months– as well as greater productivity and increased milk exports.
With all the benefits to be had, what is the Canadian government waiting for? Moving to a free market for currently supply-managed goods would reduce Canadian grocery bills, offer more choices to consumers, and improve trade relations.
Only harmful protectionist ideology – and, frankly, – maintains the current system, hurting both producers and consumers.
Krystle Wittevrongel is a Public Policy Analyst and Gabriel Giguère is a Public Policy Analyst at the Montreal Economic Institute.
©
