This article was originally published on The Conversation, an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. Disclosure information is available on the original site.
冲冲冲听
Author: Sheryl Lightfoot, Chair and Member from North America of the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) and Professor in Political Science, Public Policy and Indigenous Studies, University of British Columbia
The recent agreement reached between the Haida Nation and the government of British Columbia 鈥� called the Gaayhllxid/G铆ihlagalgang 鈥淩ising Tide鈥� Haida Title Lands Agreement 鈥� marks the first negotiated settlement in Canada to recognize an Indigenous nation鈥檚 jurisdiction over its traditional territory.
The agreement has been welcomed by First Nations leaders in B.C. as a significant breakthrough in the recognition and protection of the inherent rights of Indigenous Peoples. The agreement also serves as an inspiration to Indigenous Peoples across Canada and around the world who share the common struggle to restore a viable and sustainable land base.
Historic. Inspiring. But also long overdue, particularly in light of the clear direction provided by decades of rulings and recommendations by international human rights bodies.
鈥楧efining element of identity鈥�
The United Nations Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples found in a 2020 study that Indigenous Peoples鈥� connection to their lands and waters is 鈥渢he defining element of their identity and culture and their relationship to their ancestors and future generations.鈥澛�
Furthermore, as is the case for all people, wise management of land and resources is essential to the health and prosperity of families and communities.
The British Crown and other colonial states relied on racist concepts like the Doctrine of Discovery and Terra Nullius, known as the unowned lands doctrine, to seize Indigenous lands and ignore or subvert the laws and institutions through which Indigenous Peoples had successfully managed these territories. The consequence has been cultural loss, alienation, impoverishment, conflict and environmental degradation.
These are not simply the wrongs of the past. So long as the determination about who owns and controls what lands is based on such corrupt foundations, Indigenous Peoples will continue to be dispossessed and the state鈥檚 claims about justice, human rights and the rule of law will ring hollow.
This is why international human rights bodies have repeatedly called on all states to work proactively 鈥� and in partnership with Indigenous Peoples 鈥� to respect, protect and restore Indigenous Peoples鈥� rights to control and benefit from their traditional territories.
The weight of UNDRIP
An example is the 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which Canadian provincial and federal governments have both committed to fully implement. Significantly, the declaration itself did not create new rights. Instead, it built on decades of progressive developments in international law.
Land rights and Indigenous self-determination are a consistent thread through the entire declaration. It affirms that Indigenous Peoples have rights to 鈥渢he lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.鈥澛�
It also asserts all states 鈥渟hall give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources,鈥� giving 鈥渄ue respect to the customs, traditions and land tenure systems of the Indigenous Peoples concerned.鈥�
The positive legal obligations in UNDRIP means that Indigenous Peoples shouldn鈥檛 have to engage in costly, decades-long legal battles to restore rights that have been wrongly denied. Nor should states abuse their power to press for settlements that diminish the rights of Indigenous Peoples and further entrench an unjust status quo.
Canada and the world need more models of what pro-active, co-operative realization of Indigenous land rights can look like in practice. The Haida title agreement provides one of the most promising examples I鈥檝e seen.聽
Haida agreement
Significantly, while the settlement recognizes Haida title throughout the archipelago of Haida Gwaii, the province and the Haida Nation have also agreed that existing private property rights will be honoured, along with the resource leases and permits that have already been granted.聽
The agreement also provides for a transition period as the Haida Nation begins to exercise their jurisdiction over public lands in the territory.
Such an approach echoes UNDRIP鈥檚 call for a fair and peaceful reconciliation between the rights of Indigenous Peoples and 鈥渢he just and most compelling requirements of a democratic society.鈥� Hopefully this approach will also go a long way to address any public concerns over the consequences of this agreement and the precedent it sets.
Any time the tide shifts, and a new law or policy breaks with the status quo, there will be voices predicting conflict and ruin. This happened when B.C. adopted legislation to implement the UNDRIP. We saw it again when the federal government adopted similar national legislation. None of these dire predictions have come true.
Today, as B.C. moves forward with legislation to implement the Haida Title Lands Agreement, I hope all Canadians see this development for what it truly is: a positive step to finally live up to the values shared by Indigenous Peoples and Canadians pertaining to justice and respect for human rights.
___
Sheryl Lightfoot receives funding from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and collaborates with the Coalition for the Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples as well as the BC First Nations Energy and Mining Council.
___
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Disclosure information is available on the original site. Read the original article: https://theconversation.com/historic-haida-nation-agreement-shows-the-world-how-to-uphold-indigenous-rights-229447
Sheryl Lightfoot, Chair and Member from North America of the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) and Professor in Political Science, Public Policy and Indigenous Studies, University of British Columbia, The Conversation
